Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Leicaflex Problem
From: aglang@sprynet.com
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 09:50:53 -0700

Basic stuff, guys.
I dont know the specs on the R8, but I assume it has a focal plane shutter of 
some sort, so the  actual time the mirror is up will be a bit more than the X 
synch speed. In the case of M cameras, this is 1/50 sec (the blitz mark). It is 
the shortest speed for which the entire shutter is open at once. Shorter speeds: 
1/60, 1/125, etc. have the second curtain released shortly after the first, so 
that at 1/1000 you essentially have the two curtains moving accross the frame a 
few mm apart. Each bit of emulsion is exposed to light for 1/1000 second, but it 
taked 1/50 second to exposed the entire frame. 

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, "Roger Beamon" <beamon@primenet.com> wrote:
>On 25 Jul 97,  ted grant wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>Think about making an exposure of 1/8000 of a second!
>> That means the mirror goes up and down in almost the same time frame. To
>> the extent you do not think you have lost the image, when in actual fact
>> you lost it for 1/8000 of a second! :)
>
>Doubt this, but I'm a bit confused by your syntax above. I suspect that 
>the mirror has a finite physical limit on how fast it can go up and return 
>to rest. Shutter speed beyond this merely means that the mirror does the 
>best that it can, while the exposure is actually made in less time than 
>the mirror was operating. 
>
>Technology keeps allowing faster cyclic speeds for the mirror, but I doubt 
>that it's cyclic rate has reached 1/8000 second yet. Don't have 
>specfications here that say; does anyone know the minimum mirror cycle 
>time for the R8?
>--
>Roger Beamon  
>       Naturalist & Photographer
>       Leica Historical Society Of America
>       mailto:beamon@primenet.com
>          
>          Thought for the day:
>      As always, avoid alliteration.
>