Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Summarit BAS Test: not bad/ disagree
From: Leikon35@aol.com
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 16:33:37 -0400 (EDT)

 Lucien - I have all those lens & have gotten different results:
 The Summarit at 1.5 is the softest and Nikkor is also soft
 at f:1.4 - but the Summilux is the best, followed by the 
 the Canon f:1.4 which I believe is the best lens that Canon
 ever made.  I have both the Nikkor & Canon in LTM as well
 as using them on my Nikon & Canon A-1.
 
 Either the lenses vary a great deal from lens to lens, in which
 case you would have to check quite a few to draw any con-
 clusions, or the testing methods are open to question (which
 I doubt). There is an old saying that the quality of any lens is
 dependent on the size of the makers garbage can, which 
 means the quality of his control & rejection tolerance.
 
 Marvin Moss
 
 ============================================
 In a message dated 97-10-11 13:14:17 EDT, you write:
 << 
  Leitz Summarit 1,5/50 mm(alt) : Optik 8,4 / Mechanik 9,6
  Leica Summilux-M 1,4/50 mm    : Optik 9,2 / Mechanik 9,6
  
  By comparaison
   Nikkor 1,8/50 mm  : Optik 8,5 / Mechanik 9
  (test date 5/86)
  Nikkor 1,4/50 mm  : Optik 9,8 / Mechanik 9
  (test date 5/88)
  Canon FD 1,4/50 mm: Optik   7 / Mechanik 8
  (test date 11/85)
  Canon EF 1,8/50 mm: Optik   9 / Mechanik 9,4
  (test date 10/87)
   >>