Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What about 400, 500, and 800? Are those actually 380, 480, and 780? At 08:09 PM 1/22/98 -0600, Eric Welch wrote: >At 09:41 AM 1/22/98 -0800, you wrote: >>Thanks....I think I agree that the 2.8 is a better all-around lens for the >>180 length. Now I need to decide whether I need 180, or want 300! > >They don't make a 300. The 280 2.8 or 4 Apo telyts are fabulous lenses, >with the f/4 lens being one of the best lenses in the Leica line. And I see >them both around for $3,495 (used for 2.8 and new for 4). In fact, most 300 >2.8 lenses are actually 280s. Only Nikon's latest 300 2.8 (the AF-S) is a >true 300. Most lenses in this length are all based on the same formula, >with tweaking making the differences in optical performance. > > >========== > >Eric Welch >St. Joseph, MO >http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > >There's no such thing as nonexistence. > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/