Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kingslake and the Retrofocus Lens
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 1998 11:30:02 -0500

From Rudolf Kingslake, A HISTORY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC LENS, pp. 141-142:

"It (the reversed-telephoto or retrofocus design) has several advantages
over a normal lens of the same focal length and aperture:
	(a)  	Obtaining a short overall focal length with elements of a 
		larger and more manageable size,
	(b)	Increasing the back focal distance beyond its usual 
		magnitude, and
	(c)	Designing a system that is favorable for both a high 
		relative aperture and a wide-angular (sic) field.
In light of the third advantage, we may well ask why the reversed telephoto
type is not used for all applications.  The reasons are that such a lens is
physically large (advantage (a)), and it must be of complex construction to
correct all the aberrations, making it an expensive item."

Marc


msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!