Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A S Jordan wrote: > > Luggers: Trielmar 28-35-50 is a lousy idea as it is incompatible with the > new M6/.85.On the other hand ,Trielmar 35-50-90 offered together with the > M6/0.85 could be a big hit on the marketplace. But does one need the > exquisite focusing abilities of the M6/.85 with an f4 lens? > regards > Andrew Jordan Andrew, What IF the TriElmar is just the precursor to a new version of the CL? Would it make sense to introduce the lens before the camera was ready? Would people buy a modern version of the CL and this lens? Dennis - -- Experience is a tough teacher. It gives the test before the lesson. - -unknown