Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:55 AM 18-02-98 -0800, Frank Filippone wrote: [snip] >If I were to guess, this model is NOT an evolutionary model. It fits a >niche for the user of the 50-90 duo. It is too difficult to see the 35 >framing even witout glasses, and the standard M6 is a better fit for the >35-50-90 trio. I have not commented on the 135 lens. > >Why was it produced when the ergonomics are really awkward? Does anyone >with an M6HMF also have access to a Noctilux to see the fit on this combo? > [snip] The dealer where I placed my order thinks that the older M6 will eventually be discontinued. I disagree, especially since Solms has just about introduced the Tri-Elmar, which requires a builtin 28mm finder. I think that the M6HM will appeal mainly to people who use longer lenses for the majority of their shooting. The 35mm frames are there for the odd time when they are needed. I certainly will use my 90 more often once I get the HM. And if I see a good deal on a 135, I may consider that as well. Dan C.