Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:08 PM 3/4/98 -0500, you wrote: >It is irrational statements like this which inflame the already delicate Irrational? It's a KNOWN FACT that he has two or three times (can't remember exactly, but it was way over) the legal limit in France for alcohol. And that he had drugs that influence driving skills as well. Has nothing to do with whether the photographers were chasing Di or not. Maybe they were, and they were wrong if they were in pursuit. I don't dispute that. He was impaired. Maybe not when he is walking or talking. Lots of people can cover it up. But at 100 mph going through a tunnel, maybe impaired enough. Not one photographer has been charged. So, where does that leave us? Rational? I think so. And how about the question of taste getting a yuck out of making such a joke in the first place? ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Those who contemplate the beauty of the earth find reserves of strength that will endure as long as life lasts. Rachel Carson