Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 11:39:18 -0700

Is the R6 machanical like the R6.2?

At 11:00 AM 5/15/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote:
>R6 WAS the model before the R6.2 only significant difference is 1/2000th
>speed. Used R6 run about $1000
>----------
>> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> 
>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 
>> Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:34:29 -0700 
>> 
>>When you say R6, do you mean R6.2?
>>
>>
>>At 05:13 PM 5/14/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote:
>>>You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the
>essence
>>>of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be
>>>thrifty like me) and buy a used R6)   Mark
>>>----------
>>>> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> 
>>>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
>>>> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
>>>> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 
>>>> 
>>>>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7.
>>>>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely
>>>>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8.  The only other lenses I would ever get
>>>>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19.
>>>>
>>>>Which R body would be the best for my needs?  I like the 6.2 myself
>>>>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Francesco Sanfilippo,
>>>>Five Senses Productions
>>>>webmaster@5senses.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.5senses.com/
>>>>
>>> 
>>
>>
>>Francesco Sanfilippo,
>>Five Senses Productions
>>webmaster@5senses.com
>>
>>
>>http://www.5senses.com/
>>
> 


Francesco Sanfilippo,
Five Senses Productions
webmaster@5senses.com


http://www.5senses.com/