Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What about the 90/2.8 compared to the 75? At 12:37 AM 5/17/98 -0500, Eric Welch wrote: >At 05:16 PM 5/16/98 -0700, you wrote: >>What were the differences you saw, Eric? Were you trying to say the >>180 or the 75 produced better images? > >First of all, you really can't directly compare the lenses, since they're >so different. But the final image sharpness was visibly better with the 75. >Better than the 90 Summicron can do at f/2. Not all that much, but >noticeable. And the overall image quality of the 75 is, like they say, full >of character. > > >========= > >Eric Welch >St. Joseph, MO > > The Devil whispered behind the leaves, It's pretty, but is it Art? - >Rudyard Kipling > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/