Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 75/1.4 versus 90/2.0
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 20:39:54 +0200

Shallow yes - but if you are talking about portrait at 1 m with the 90 =
mm
lens you must compare it with portrait at 0.83 m with the 75 mm lens
because of the lower magnification of the shorter lens. What do the tab=
les
say?
Raimo
photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
nyt my=F6s suomeksi

- ----------
> From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 75/1.4 versus 90/2.0
> Date: 11. elokuuta 1998 21:31
>=20
> Richard Clompus wrote:
>=20
> > My question:  Does the 75/1.4 M lens provide a significantly more
narrow
> > depth of field for portrait work than the 90/2.0  when both lenses =
are
used
> > with their maximum apertures?
>=20
> Richard,
>=20
> According to the depth of field tables in Eastland's book, at a given
distance,
> say, 1 meter, the depth of field with the 90/2.0 is from 0.99m to 1.0=
1mm
(i.e.
> 2 cm) while at the same distance, with the 75/1.4 you have 0.993m to
1.006m,
> i.e. 1.3cm. Pretty shallow in either case...
>=20
> Nathan
>=20
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Overijse, Belgium
>=20
> Photography page:  http://members.tripod.com/~belgiangator/index.html
> Motorcycle page:=20
http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/1704/index.html
>=20