Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin and TMZ
From: "steve" <steve@mvillage.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 22:24:22 +0000

why ektapress 100?  Just curious.  Not reala, gold 100 etc. 
thanks
steve
- ----------
>From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin and TMZ
>Date: Sat, Sep 5, 1998, 12:46 AM
>

>At 07:25 AM 9/4/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>What do you think of processing at whatever the current room temperature
>>is, and adjusting the development time based on the deviation from 68
>>degrees?  I read somewhere that a good adjustment factor is 10% for each
>>4 degrees.  I haven't experimented with this, but if it works it'll make
>>processing much more enjoyable.
>
>I don't because TMax films are optimized to be processed at 75 degrees.
>It's a whole lot easier to remember processing times too when you use three
>different films and push and pull one of them at four different speeds and
>another six different speeds.*
>
>According to John Sexton, who was one of their testers (I was too, but they
>didn't listen nearly as closely to me as him! <G>)  the mid-tones are
>optimum at 75 degrees. I found him to be correct. Using Leica lenses, we
>should be optimizing our development as much as possible. No?
>
>As a photojournalist often processing my stuff on deadline (that is, walk
>into the darkroom at 8:50 and have the pictures in the system by 9:30) I
>used 85 degrees for speed. And 75 degrees when not on deadline.
>
>
>(* Tmax 100 at 100 - TMax 400 at 200, 400, 800, 1600 and P3200 at 400, 800,
>1600, 3200, 6400 and 12,800. Now it's Ektapress 100, Fujicolor 400 and 800
>- the latter pushed up to 3200. I do miss black and white.) 
>-- 
>
>Eric Welch
>St. Joseph, MO
>http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch
>
>Prepositions are not words to end sentences with.
>