Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Compared as Erwin would compare? No. Used both with 35 Summilux ASPH, 50 Summicron, and 90 Summicron? Yes. I much prefer the look of the XP2 Super to the Kodak. I find the XP2 Super is contrastier, and even when printed in the auto color printer provides a more traditional B&W look than the Kodax film... For what ever it's worth.... > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Bill Butz > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 3:36 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] T400CN Vs XP2 Super with Leica M lens > > > Hi All > Has anyone compared T400CN film with XP2 Super using Leica M lens. My > M3 lens are all of older vintage and probably have less contrast than > present generation lens. I have shot a few rolls of each and tend > to prefer > the T400CN as it seems to have better separation in the high values. The > skin tones are very smooth and the two stops added speed is great for > outdoor portraits in natural light. Your comments please .Bill > >