Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] TTL vs Auto Flash
From: Bruce & Gini Pfabe <pfabe@mci2000.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:22:22 -0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01BE012F.19D2F920
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am a new LUG member.  I have been enjoying the flow of information.
My question is where is the practical difference between TTL flash (as =
with the new M6TTL) compared to auto flash with units like Vivitar =
285/283?

Also, I echo the comments of the Rolei 35.  I have two and have always =
had excellent results.
Bruce Pfabe
pfabe@realtor.com



- ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01BE012F.19D2F920
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I am a new LUG member.&nbsp; I have =
been=20
enjoying the flow of information.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>My question is where is the =
practical difference=20
between TTL flash (as with the new M6TTL) compared to auto flash with =
units like=20
Vivitar 285/283?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Also, I echo the comments of the Rolei 35.&nbsp; I =
have two=20
and have always had excellent results.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Bruce Pfabe</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"mailto:pfabe@realtor.com">pfabe@realtor.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01BE012F.19D2F920--