Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>You are right: everybody, especially the frequent printers, can avoid this expense, but Multigraph will make you faster, and probably will also show you some new ways of printing, in order to obtain the maximum from your negative with a reasonable effort and time. Lucky who can do the same by the means of his experience. My experience in the darkroom; long hours in a small, but busy lab, taught me how to judge a negative and select the proper grade of paper for the image. I printed all Bantam, 126, 110, Minox and 35MM film on a tried and true Focomat Enlarger, and I had Kodabromide fiber (and other papers) in all contrast grades readily available. Eventually you learn what a particular negative will require for the paper and magnification. Incidentally, I printed thousands of rolls of film in this lab, all sizes from 2R to murals and I never used any form of automation or any exposure meters. I think a dedicated printer can also learn to do the same. DIGITAL COMMENTS: I was a member of several lists discussing the virtues of digital and the demise of silver. I think I was bumped because of my strong opinions. Actually, I consider them facts. I do not see traditional methods disappearing too soon, but it seems to be headed that way. Less and less people in the dark and less and less materials available from Kodak makes me wonder if one day, we will have just a few papers available. I think that if you consider what it takes to get close to film with digital equipment, the costs are so high, that silver is still the only choice. For example, at the time, I was remodeling a space for a darkroom, and I figured I would have about $2500.00 into the effort. That included some new equipment and my old equipment. I asked one of the digital 'Masters' this question: If he was so convinced that digital was the only reasonable way to go, could he supply me with enough speed and memory for the computer I needed, and a digital camera that approaches film @ some 50 Thousand Dollars, and a large format printer like an IRIS Printer so I can print murals, for the $2500.00 I was about to spend on a new Silver Based Darkroom. He then fudged and got mad at me. I maintained that the cost to come close to film requires a vast investment. and there is no guarantees that the images will last as long and something better will come along to make my investment in digital a lost one. What happens to your investment if a hard drive crashes, or you have a problem in restoring a backup (If you remember to do this), or if an essential file gets corrupted, or scientists discover some as yet unknown problem with the current storage media, and on and on and on. My negatives going back to the early 1900's are perfect and will be in the next 100 years potentially. A hundred Grand will still purchase a lot of Leica Products and I think the quality will certainly be there. RM