Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, Bill. This guy is like the idiots where I work, reverence for every new "political" artist.....Mention one of the "masters", they look at you like they saw an alien........many of our graduates (!) have never heard of Steichen, Weston, Smith, Cunningham, Bourke-White, etc....they think "ANSEL ADAMS" is a guy who make pictures for Wal-Mart to sell........it's sickening. Walt On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, Bill Franson wrote: > >I am puzzled why modern photographers revere these old names of the > >distant past. Their images for the most part are second rate when > >compared to the awesome results produced by many current, known and > >unknown, photographers today. > >I wonder how many of the old masters would succeed with todays > >competition if they (hypothetically) had to start now. I suspect that > >the versatility of modern equipment would render their flair for > >peeling paint pictures totally obsolete. > > > Hey Alan, > Tell us why the images of "the old names of the distant past" are "for the > most part second rate"? How are we modern photographers getting "awesome > results"? And how different is a Leica M6 from its ancient cousin except > for the fact that it has a meter? > > Bill Franson > > > > > >