Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric Welch wrote: > > >Nikon F5 > >(and in a way the F90X) was found much faster than both the EOS1n > > Proof is in the pudding. The N90x (F90X) is fast, but it's not THAT fast. Here we go again: what is your knowledge of that particular test, the conditions it was done in, the procedures, the points of comparison ? You (seem to ? or is it a joke?) contradict it with a statement like "proof is in the pudding", whatever that means in this context, but which lets me understand YOU know what is real because you have probably had your own private experience with it. Good tests, and that one was an interesting one, protect us from such subjectivism: that test has proven something that goes against the dominant accepted cliches. Thanks CdI for a little more truth and a little less black magic. Proves how much those informations are useful and how necessary a competent specialised press can be. Alan