Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Friday
From: "A.H.SCHMIDT" <horsts@actek.com.au>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 15:26:52 +1100

I have to agree with you there Walter. I can not see the advantage of a Friday only
sales day. If every day was acceptable, then the amount of ads would be roughly
divided by 7 (days in the week). Therefore if you have now 49 ads on a Friday only,
you'll have now seven on any given day. This returns friday back to normal. A few
ads every day are not as disturbing, then hundreds on one specific day. The problem
(is it?), when Friday starts and finished will also be solved.

Walter S Delesandri wrote:

> How 'bout no dealer ads, ever?  Don't worry, if I ever have anything
> else to sell, I'll find some redneck to buy it....even if I have to
> give it away.....I prefer to sell/buy from enthusiasts, but I'll be
> damned if I can (or should) plan my life around the several lists
> I read....
>
> Many thanks to the TWO fine gentlemen I've dealt with on this list...
> I don't know whether it was friday or not...but if I decide to sell
> something on Saturday, it'll be long gone on rec.photo.marketplace
> before I wait till Friday.  But I shall not "screw up" the "system"
> again by posting to the LUG first, or at a lower price...
>
> Walt
>
> On
> Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jim Brick wrote:
>
> > I pretty much agree in that sometimes the timing is such that you are going
> > to sell an item and would like to give your fellow LUGgers a first chance.
> > I see nothing wrong with this. But we have many people who have a whole
> > laundry list of stuff that they post every Friday, like clockwork. And we
> > have several commercial buyers and sellers on the list. These lists of
> > equipment and commercial people should use Friday. Period. This M6 HM TTL,
> > from the looks of it, is a commercial AD. It should have been posted on
> > Friday. If occasional a LUGger decides to trade-in an item, or advertise on
> > e-bay, or whatever, I, for one, would like to have a crack at buying it
> > before it's given to the masses. Which means the occasional mid-week message.
> >
> > IMHO,
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > At 06:25 PM 2/9/99 -0800, you wrote:
> > >I, for one, think the "Friday" restriction on for sale items should be
> > >re-thought. It's great from the buyers perspective to know that for sale
> > >items will only be listed on one day (actually, closer to tow days given the
> > >LUG's global nature), but consider the seller's point of view. If I'm going
> > >to post a for sale item, it's because I've already decided to sell it
> > >elsewhere, or, more likely, decided to take it down to the local shop and
> > >trade it in on something else. I'd post it on the LUG just to pass it on to
> > >someone here who wanted it, not to sell it for a higher price. And, I
> > >wouldn't mind waiting a day or so before selling elsewhere or trading in.
> > >But, if I decide on a Saturday, I'm probably not going to wait a week to
> > >post it here just to see if someone wants it.
> > >
> > >What's the difference? Then again, I'm a trouble-maker for a living.
> > >
> > >Bryan
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: csocolow <csocolow@microserve.net>
> > >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > >Date: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 3:32 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [Leica] another M6 HM TTL!
> > >
> > >
> > >>Photovilla@aol.com wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I have gotten a second M6 .85 HM TTL body. This is new in box, complete.
> > >I am
> > >>> giving Luggers first shot at this one just as last time.
> > >>>
> > >>> It will be sold for $2145 just as the last one. A full $50 less than B&H
> > >will
> > >>> be selling them when they get them.
> > >>>
> > >>> I will also pay $1100 for a good condition M6 chrome as trade in. (Exc++
> > >or
> > >>> better.)
> > >>>
> > >>> Please contact me via email.
> > >>>
> > >>> later,
> > >>> Rich
> > >>
> > >>Is it Friday already?
> > >>--
> > >>Carl Socolow
> > >>
> > >>http://members.tripod.com/SocPhoto/
> > >
> >