Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thib: I found your post very interesting. Although I do not have an M3 to compare to the TTL I certainly would have liked to. After months of not really enjoying using my M6HM I came to the conclusion that the sources of my problems were twofold; my vision combined with the HM viewfinder. I spent over an hour switching back and forth between my HM and a TTL .72. I have concluded that the TTL is a bit brighter than my HM but the image is size in the viewfinder suits my eyesight better. As you know the TTL viewfinder should be brighter due to the small increase in size. With technology being what it is today I would think Leica could dramatically improve the viewfinder on the M6. IMHO this would be more important than TTL. Perhaps I should look around for a mint M3. What do you think? Bob Bedwell << There was a Leica show off yesterday at my local photo dealer. I had the opportunity to play with the new M lenses and new bodies as well as with the R8 +winder and some of the new ROM-equiped lenses. One first disappointment : The ROM lenses do not fit on the leicaflexes...it's too bad. Then I started to play with the two M6TTL 0.72 and 0.85. My first impression was terrible! The finders appeared to me as being not so bright and the framelines not so contrasty. So I took my old M2 and compared the view : the old M2 was much more brighter, even the rangefinder window and the brightlines were much better defined! What is going on? In 1999, the finders are not as bright as in 1959 or even before because another guy had a M3DS and agreed with me! There was really a huge difference even with an M4-P... My other disappointment is coming from the 0.85. IMHO, 0.85 makes a too small window for the 50 mm frame when compared to M3 and we can hardly see anything in the 35 mm frame (like the 28 for 0.72). So the one who wants a bright finder with contrasty brightlines and the best setup to use the 50 mm has to go back to the M3 with an exposure meter... It's too bad in 1999... Thib. >>