Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan, I have to disagree with you. Although the situations that I appreciate the differences in the following examples might be the rare situation for many photogs, these aren't unusual for me: - - shooting wide open with a 35 summilux - - interior photography with a 24 In these examples, I gladly upgraded from 2nd best Leica solutions to the best because I can clearly see the difference. The price I paid to upgrade is well worth it because I enjoy the results so much more. John At 11:00 AM 3/13/99 -0500, Dan Cardish wrote: >Even when the difference between best and second best is miniscule? > >Dan C. > >At 10:47 AM 13-03-99 EST, you wrote: >>Walt, I gladly pay the large differential for the highest quality. You are >>correct, the best costs a lot more than second best. It is worth it. >> >>Tom Shea >> > > >