Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 90 vs. 35
From: Xavier Logean <xavier.logean@epfl.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:35:53 +0200

Carlos,

I would go for a 35 summicron (for the same reason than others already
mentionned) and
I would buy an Hektor 135, which you can find for ~$150.
In that way you almost get all you want ;-)

Xavier


Carlos Blanco wrote:

> Dear luggers,
>     I know that this question may sound stupid for most of you, but I think
> that it is the best place to ask.
>     I own an M2 with a summicron 50mm. Now, I'm planning to buy my second
> lens and I cannot decide whether an Elmar 90mm f4 or a 35mm. In fact, I
> don't have money enough to aford an Elmarit 90mm so please don't suggest my
> buying an expensive 35mm. To make matters worse I don't know much about
> leica M 35mm lenses.