Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] AF, a FAD? Jeeze...It's not that hard...
From: "Dan Post" <dwpost@email.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 10:35:28 -0400

John-
Considering how 'touchy' and unpredictable a Polar Bear can be... I'd be
downwind zone focused somewhere near infinity, far enough that I could
bracket like Hell! Thank goodness for Leica's quiet shutters!
Dan  :o)~

- -----Original Message-----
From: John Poirier <MJ.Patterson@nt.sympatico.ca>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] AF, a FAD? Jeeze...It's not that hard...


>Actually, I think the true challenge for any TTL meter is a polar bear in a
>snowstorm.
>
>John Poirier
>Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Date: Monday, May 03, 1999 9:15 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] AF, a FAD? Jeeze...It's not that hard...
>
>
>>Eric Welch wrote:
>>snip
>>> The F5 is a stupendously amazing meter. It will do perfect exposures in
>>> more situations than any other camera I've ever seen.
>>>
>>> And it can't do backlight. Period.
>>>
>>> No camera can do backlight. Period.
>>>
>>> If the F5 can't, no camera can. That's my opinion. You come up with a
>>> better, more accurate meter than the F5 and I will concede your point.
>>snip
>>If a camera could go spot why couldn't it do backlight?
>>Mark Rabiner
>>down spot!!!roll over!!!woof
>>
>