Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]skip, nathan and fellow luggers, maybe it has something to do with the lens you start out with, but when i got my first leica back, i opted for a 50/2 summicron instead of the 35/2 summicron (can't remember why right now), and though i've also added several lenses since then, i am most partial to my 50. today, when i left the house, i purposefully left with my m6 and 35/2 summicron. i'm determined to get USED to this lens <G>..... kim At 06:03 PM 7/10/99 +0200, you wrote: >Skip, > >You should absolutely go for this combination. When I got started with Leica, I >also bought the 35mm Summicron. And while I have added several lenses since then, >the 35 is still the one I use the most. > >Nathan > >SCripscan@aol.com wrote: > >> I've ordered an M6 and am debating which lens would be my BEST first lens for >> it. I seem to recall the lengthy discussion concerning everyone's opinion >> regarding his/her favorite Leica lens. I think the discussion ended up in >> favor of the 35mm Summicron f2. Well, I located a formerly owned one in >> excellent condition to go along with the new M6. What do ya think? Should >> that be the one, guys/gays? >> >> Skip Converse > >-- >Nathan Wajsman >Overijse, Belgium > >General photo site: http://members.tripod.com/belgiangator/ >Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ >Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/ >