Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Sopranos
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:30:34 -0700

I have to defend Mark here. Mark Rabiner never speaks in innuendos and is
never condescending. I've read most of the posts that Joe is speaking about
and they were neither from Mark nor does Mark leave prints in the soup for
8-10 minutes.

When reading posts that are new and contain pieces of their posts, it is
sometimes difficult to separate party 1 from party 2 from party 3. When
using someone's name in a response, one should carefully inspect the
original post to ascertain who wrote what and when. Who's on first? No
who's on second, what's on first...

Jim


At 02:10 PM 8/14/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Joe Codispoti wrote:
>> 
>> Raimo and Rabiner:
>> 
>> To what point have we degenerated that we must use innuendos and
>> condescending behavior in order to attract attention?
>> Does it make one feel superior or does it take one back to first-year high
>> school?
>> 
>> Ridicule and put-downs are not worthy of a civilised society. But then,
>> having enough money to buy a Leica is not necessarily indicative of one's
>> level of civility. Grow up.
>> 
>> Joseph Codispoti
>
>Just as your name is now at the top of this post and mine will be after I post
>it it is hard to sometimes attribute who said what. I believe I am on your
team
>on the anti Ridicule and condescending behavior club. I think I was fighting
>these battles on a post you may have attributed to me. 
>In other words-
>I don't know what you thought I said but I'll just tell you ahead of time: I
>DIDN'T DO IT! 
>Of course the whole thing is a tad vague. Quote me here or privately and I'll
>justify or explain what I was saying.
>Mark Rabiner