Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Impersonation scare [no Leica content]
From: Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:13:52 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)

Get the government thieves/thugs/lawyers out of our bank accounts and our 
private lives, for that matter, and you don't HAVE these worries.  I'm a helluva 
lot more afraid of our "officials" than of any japanese dude with too much 
money and too little time posting to a group of anal-retentives.

Follow the news as closely as you follow this group and you'll be FAR more 
worried by the attack from our own government on its citizens than you are of 
some little bank fraud.

Remember Waco....

Walt in Denton, Tx.


On Fri, 3 Sep 1999 06:54:10 EDT Zeissleica@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/2/99 4:18:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> red735i@earthlink.net writes:
> 
> > ........Even seen a document with you name signed to it that you didn't
> >  write?......
> >  
> >  Yes, but don't care..... it wasn't me..... 
> >
> >  Use my name all you want, but please, once in a while, on the PAY TO THE
> >  ORDER OF line on a check.
> 
> I wouldn't be so flippant if I were you.
> 
> Try coming home from vacation and finding a strange bank account statement 
> with your name on it that you didn't open or give approval for.
> 
> Consider the consequences when you discover the money in the account (many,  
> many thousands of dollars) may have been illegally obtained (or at least very 
> gray in nature).
> 
> Then start sweating when you realize *you* are the responsible party for 
> capital gains taxes on the account and *you* are the one authorities will 
> seek when the money in it is removed and checks made against the nonexistent 
> funds start bouncing.
> 
> This nightmare actually happened to me and my wife 7 years ago.  Everything 
> worked out in the end (months later), but I still worry about the incident 
> recurring, as the other party is still out there and has a history of 
> continuing to do similar actions since our incident.
> 
> Do not take such impersonations lightly!
> 
> /Mitch