Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Which seperate meter?
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 12:04:58 -0700

InfinityDT@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 9/4/99 2:19:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> ewelch@ponyexpress.net writes:
> 
> << At 09:25 AM 9/4/99 -0800, you wrote:
>  >does any one have any preferences, not only in terms of brands, but also
>  >regarding analogue/digital meters.
> 
>  The two names I put at the top are Minolta and Sekonic. You can't go wrong
>  with either one of those. And for what you need, I'd stay away from the top
>  of the line.
> 
>  Eric Welch
>  St. Joseph, MO >>
> 
> I have the Sekonic L-408 Multi-meter (incident, 5-deg. spot--a nice adjunct
> to the Leica's not-so-narrow angle, ambi and flash).  Does it all, fairly
><Snip> 

Why would someone leave "Gossen" out of this paragraph/equation? If they didn't
invent the meter they should have! Some people say Kleenex instead of tissue; I
say Gossen instead of meter.
Mark Rabiner
not really