Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think we can learn from this and simply note that it is not necessarily the tool that makes the photograph but the person behind it. Whather Ansel used a Leica, Contax, or Brownie is irrelevant. It is the images he created that capture one's imagination (at least for some) that really counts. Peter K > ---------- > From: Eric Welch[SMTP:ewelch@neteze.com] > Reply To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 9:57 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: I can't believe I'm losing this argument > > At 12:02 PM 11/20/99 -0500, csocolow wrote: > >Hmmm. 1893. AA never looked his age. And Oscar Barnak was way ahead of > >his times. :-) > > Actually, this proves the Barnack story a myth! :-) > > Eric Welch > Carlsbad, CA > > http://www.neteze.com/ewelch > > What is the probability that something will happen according to the odds? >