Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] deserve to be green
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:21:19 -0000

So refresh my memory - which did I use for push processing - acufine or
diafine?

B. D(amn! My memory's really going south fast!) Colen
(With apologies to Bob "Always coming up with something clever" McEown)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark
> Rabiner
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:55 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] deserve to be green
>
>
> "B. D. Colen" wrote:
> >
> > Eric - I think you're right about UFG - which I had
> completely forgotten
> > about. Didn't the same folks make UFG, Diafine and Acufine?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of
> > > Eric Welch
> > > Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 3:21 PM
> > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us;
> > > 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> > > Subject: RE: [Leica] deserve to be green
> > >
> > >
> > > At 07:29 AM 11/22/99 +0000, Jem Kime wrote:
> > > >Dev. in UFG (whatever that brand is -
> > > >ultra fine grain?) for 3-5 mins at 68 F.
> > >
> > > Same company that makes Accufine, I believe. If I'm not
> > > mistaken, that's
> > > the developer that you don't have to worry about time or
> > > temperature, no?
> > > If I ever go back to printing black and white I'll have to
> > > give that a try.
> > >
> > > Eric Welch
> > > Carlsbad, CA
> > >
> > http://www.neteze.com/ewelch
> >
> > Nostalgia: The good old days multiplied by a bad memory.
>
> Your memory is doing mighty fine!
> Acufine you have to be just as careful as anything else.
> Diafine is the developer in which time and temperature
> considerations are much
> less because it is a two bath.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Fine.
>