Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]M6TTL HM: "In terms of feel, balance, finish, smoothness, precision, finesse, and yes, optical performance, it is still unsurpassed." 21mm Asph.: "The best performing and most expensive 21mm ... a peerless jewel that costs a king's ransom." 35mm 'lux: "In terms of performance, this lens is unsurpassed and seldom equalled among 35mm 1.4 optics." 90mm APO: "On outstanding 90mm f/2 lens -- the best we've ever tested and far superior to the old 90mm f/2 Summicron, which was and is no slouch." Tom - ----- Original Message ----- From: Jerry S. Justianto <jsjm6@cbn.net.id> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 7:20 PM Subject: Re: [Leica]The value of Popular Photography > In Indonesia, for me to read the January Edition of PopPhoto will be in > March 2000. > Can you please tell me the conclusion of the article about M6TTL? > > Regards, > JSJ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeff S <4season@boulder.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 1999 12:45 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica]The value of Popular Photography > > > > Free publicity is a great thing, though I think Popular Photo's glory > > days were in the '60s and '70s (thicker, more columns), so today, I'd > > think Leica might also benefit from getting coverage elsewhere, > > including some non-photographic magazines with the right reader > > demographics. > > > > And they already have an email newsletter, but don't announce zingers or > > "members-only pre sales" or indeed, anything that would make a person > > stand outside the nearest store fifteen minutes before opening. They > > have been mailing out Leica View lately, but email lists are lots > > cheaper. The newsletters could link to the Leica website, which could > > link to dealers (who would have reciprocal links) > > > > But on the whole, I think Mr. Cohn really does "get it". > > > > > > Dan S wrote: > > > > > > So what is the value of the mag? MARKETING. Leica should be thrilled > that > > > they got a decent review in Pop Photo, not because the testing is worth > the > > > paper it is written on, but because that one crappy biased magazine will > > > generate more sales of M's and lenses than all the "M campaign" > brochures in > > > the world. > > > > > > It has exposure, and that is the one thing Leica really needs now. > > > Too many people just don't know the company even exists. > > > > -- > > > > Jeff Segawa > > Somewhere in Boulder, Colorado > > http://www.boulder.net/~4season > > > > > >