Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hey Luggers: A week or so ago we had a thread going on the density changes that happen to prints between when the light goes on over the fixer and when the print is dry. Several people offered some suggestions which I said I would try and report back. I made a few prints this week, and I was able to make some observations. I have a small fluorescent fixture about two feet over the fixer. (I work in the garage and the main lights are at the top of the stairs.) When I turn it on the prints appear fairly washed out. I taped some heavy paper over it to knock down the light a bit but that didn't help the look of the prints. I found that by just lifting the prints out of the fix I see more of the highlight values. I then moved them away from the light to a large tray on the floor. When I get them to where the light is fairly dim I get a good idea of what the final print will look like. I squegeed the prints the first night, but on the second I did without. I haven't done any before and after squegeeing tests yet. My fairly preliminary conclusions are that getting the prints out of the fix and away from the light enables me to judge the wet print fairly accurately. I can't discount the effects of practice. Just being careful and knowing what to look for helps a lot. The stuff I was printing was shot under fairly difficult conditions and didn't have a lot of subtlety. I expect to refine the techniques when I get back to printing some better negatives. I expect as usually happens that training the eye will greatly simplify the process. I used to print a lot but I didn't do any for about five years and very little for some time before that. It takes a while to get back into it and to get used to the new materials. Thanks for all of the good suggestions. I've learned a lot from this group. Mike D