Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Henning wrote >The Horizon 202 can be a very decent camera, and the lens is not bad >generally Henning, my experience was with the original Horizon- is the lens on the Horizon 202 a new design (or did I just have one of those Friday afternoon Russian cameras)? I'd welcome any feedback from yourself or anyone else who has knowledge of these cameras. I was very interested by the possibilities it presented, but as I said, the lens on the one I tried was not up to the mark- significant edge fall off (seen at the top and bottom of the image, as a result of the swivel lens) which could clearly be seen on a 10" wide print even when the negative was made with the lens stopped down to f11. (When I say clearly, I mean that my non-photographer wife said "That's not sharp," the instant she saw the print. And if she says that, it ain't sharp. Just in case you think I'm excessively picky. Well I am, but that's not the point.) I believe there is also a 120 version of the Horizon- comments? I loved the effect though, and I reiterate- a panoramic taken with a swivel lens is just not the same as a letter-box crop from a normal wideangle; I've done my share of those too, usually using a 75mm Rodenstock Grandagon on 5x4, and the "stretching " of the image at the sides is clear. (And I doubt that anyone, even on this group, is going to criticise the quality of this lens.) To get back on topic, though, last week's UK Amateur Photographer has an article on panoramics - I had not read it till last night. It mentions a proprietary software called Spin Panorama which is distributed with Epson printers, so some people may already have it, or a trial version can be had from www.pictureworks.com According to the article, this should make stitching your Leica panoramas together a piece of cake. Best Rod