Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M Camera Reliability - Gandy v. Marc v. Puts v. the LUGgies
From: John <bosjohn@mediaone.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:55:03 -0500

Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote:
> 
> A good friend of mine has been repairing Lieca's (professionally, that is
> the way he makes a living) for about 30 years.  He too has noted that the
> older M3s are Leica's finest mechanically engineered camera.  That is not to
> say the M6 is a bad camera, but only to say that the master craftsmen were
> still at Leica when the M3 was in production.
> 
> As to Mr. Gandy being asked to name sources, that's an old lawyer's trick!
> Once named, they will be picked apart and condemned by M6 owners as heretics
> for mentioning that older M cameras are better built.  You know, basically
> the same as discrediting witnesses in court.....shades of Johnny Cochran.
> 
> Peter K
For about five years I owned an M3 no. 701243, which is a very early M3
indeed, the 1243ed.  My reputable repairman, Steve, told me that these first
cameras were essentially bench built and the machining etc., superb.  He tells
me the bevel around the viewfinder/range finder housing was done by hand on my
camera.  I am in awe of the workmanship on that camera.  Sadly I sold it one
time when I needed money.
John