Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>On the other hand, don't get too wrapped up in the magical reliability of any lens test method, or lens tester. Regardless of what a great job they did, they didn't test the lenses they didn't test. There is an manufacturing tolerance for even Leica lenses. How do we know where a tested lens fits into those tolerances ? At the high end? in the middle? or at the low end ?<<< Stephen, And let's not forget that any "test" is a shortcut--the best way to get to know a lens is to use it over an extended period of time and carefully and intelligently appraise results. It's amazing to me how much weight people give to tests, and how little weight they are willing to give, generally, to experience. I have photographers contact me all the time who admit that they have never liked a lens they've used for years, but they continue to use it because it got a good test report. Or the opposite, that they have a lens that they really love because it performs wonderfully for them, but they guess it's not a good lens because it didn't earn favorable marks on some test. And my favorite--people contacting me to ask for an evaluation of a lens they already own. Silliness! >>>The ideal testing situation may be to test a large enough sample lenses to reasonably be sure what the average performance really is. I don't put much trust in a test of ONE lens. Increase the sample to 25 to 50 lenses in different serial number batches, and I would be inclined to believe the average results. Another lens testing problem is the source of the lenses. Is the lens a random off the shelf purchase, or specially selected through the manufacturer and distributor?<<< My son's "Uncle" Arthur Kramer, when testing lenses for _Modern Photography_, would receive lenses from the manufacturer that would test spectacularly well. When he asked, he was told that they were regular production samples. So he would reply that if this was so, he would buy this lens and keep it. And the manufacturers would say, no, no! Send that lens back and we'll send you a new one! And he'd say, no, this one is fine, I'll keep this one. There was really nothing they could say without admitting that the lens had been carefully cherry-picked for the test. As Arthur said, he got a lot of awfully nice lenses that way. <s> I only ever got sent one cherry-picked lens, and it was a beauty. I tried two other samples of the same lens bought off the shelf, and they were very good--but not quite _as_ good. - --Mike