Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I read all the Leica lenses that I have (35 summicron, 75 lux, 50 noct) Only Noctilux that stated usage of filter is not recommended. Other did not mention anything about not using filter. JSJ - ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2000 9:50 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux result???? -filters > Marc James Small wrote: > > > > At 06:50 AM 1/23/2000 +0000, D Khong wrote: > > > > > >I've used my Noctilux with and without the filter on, and frankly folks, I > > >cannot tell the difference between the two situations. Whatever perceived > > >degradation is, IMHO, only dandruff deep. > > > > It is the other way around, Dan. The degradation caused by filters is > > real, but only can be seen when REALLY large blow-ups are made. For normal > > use (4" by 5" to some, 5" by 7" to others, even 8" by 10" to yet others), > > it probably isn't observable. But try a 20" by 24" full-frame blow-up, > > though, and you'll note a difference. > > > > It all comes down to those who absolutely, positively must have absolute > > optical perfection. Those guys will never use a filter without a > > colour-correction reason or the like. > > > > Marc > > > This has all gotten be thinking about filter stuff again. > I've got B+W 060 yellow-greens at many sizes for every conceivable lens that I > have from 24E for my Rollei 35 to Bay 60 for my Hasselblad. > But one GAP. > Friday night I picked up a 67 from Pro Photo out of a grab box and it fit my > only view camera lens a Fujinon 210! > So I saved myself a pile of cash as I got it for only $20! > Now maybe I'll get that camera out and shoot some sheet film! > But as I'm playing around with the thing I look at the back of the lens sticking > out the back of the Lensboard, it is threaded. > I guessed it was 46mm, wrong. 49 fit! And I've got those because of my 135 3.4 > APO. Olympus sized!!!! Am I going to same some bucks or what? > I know AA used to put his gels on the back like that. I like the idea if feels > right to me. After the light goes all through the lens it THEN gets filtered. > Would the filter then not need to be multi coated as much? I love lenes with > rear filter arrangements! Anybody have any behind the scenes insights into all > this? I'm going to be tossing and turning all night about this. Ruminating! > Mark Rabiner >