Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Save Leica! (was: Ted Grant's Ravings) (now: Rob's Heresy!)
From: kabob@tiac.net (Bob Keene/Karen Shehade)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:31:38 -0400

>Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:17:38 -0500
>From: Rob Schneider-Laura Tully <robslaurat@earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Save Leica! (was: Ted Grant's Ravings)

Ahhhh! Heresy! Heresy! Burn the witch! Burn the witch!

Bob (who bets he could buy a 'discontinued' camera from someone for less) Keene


>>
>Here's where I jump off the bandwagon.  I honestly don't care whether Leica
>Camera A.G. is in business next year or not.  If they go out of business
>tomorrow, there are (and will continue to be) tens of thousands of M2, M3,
>M4(-2/-P), M5, M6 bodies on the market or ready for market.  There are
>probably hundreds of thousands of lenses of all vintages and focal lengths.
>There are a number of highly skilled, dedicated, independent repair people.
>So what if the Leica M becomes the Rolleiflex of 35mm?  The cameras and
>lenses will continue to function, will continue to be repairable, and will
>continue to be for sale on the used market for decades.
>
snipz

>This is the Leica USERS group, right?  It's not the Leica investors,
>sympathizers or sycophants (well . . . .) group.  At least not for me.  If
>Leica can figure out how to maintain its niche in the 35mm marketplace, more
>power to 'em.  If they fold, so long, it was nice to know ya.  But I have a
>hunch that my M6's and lenses won't turn to dust the day they lock the
>factory gates.  And I won't stop using them, either.
>
>Rob Schneider