Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] More misinterpretation
From: "steve lehuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:34:40 -0500

oy, vey!!!
Mike must be having a slow day at work.
Steve
Annapolis


- ----------
>From: Mike Johnston <michaeljohnston@ameritech.net>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: [Leica] More misinterpretation
>Date: Mon, Jan 31, 2000, 6:27 AM
>

>
>
>
> And how is that in any way a pertinent response to the issue at hand? I
> made no judgement whatsoever about Mark's photographic expertise,
> skills, or work--nor would I, since I know nothing about those things. I
> merely said that I often don't understand from his posted messages what
> the hell he's geting at.
>
> I had hoped to avoid a forensic analysis of this, but read this again:
>
>
> But, at the same time, sorry, Mark, for picking this to death. As usual,
> we tend to have to niggle over simple points like dogs worrying a bone.
> All I said was that I sometimes don't understand what you're saying; and
> all I really meant by that was that sometimes I don't understand what
> you're saying. My statement wasn't intended to extend to your printing
> skills, your professionalism, or the phase of the moon.
>
> --Mike
>
>
>
>
>