Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To the best of my knowledge, I used to room with a police chappy, you do not have to supply ID but you do have to identify yourself when asked. If the officer wishes, they can take you into custody until such a time as they can verify your statements. You can also be taken into custody for not having sufficient means to support yourself (ie. money, proof of residence or proof of employment). Naturally with the miles of book keeping, reports, etc, they would rather just leave you alone and go and get some doughnuts. If you are driving a motor vehicle, you are required by law to furnish proof of registration, insurance and driver's licence. Even if you have the stuff but forgot your wallet, you can be charged with failure to produce the proper papers (though once again the doughnut clause usually overrides this). I once worked on a young lady's car and on the dash board, in prominent letters, was inscribed: "Bad Cop No Donut". John Collier > From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> > Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 05:51:56 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Leica] Police harassment / Gelatin Silver > > I am pretty certain that here in Canada a police officer must place you > under arrest before he has the right to ask you for identification. At > least, this used to be true, I am not aware of any changes to the Criminal > Code that affect this. >