Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
From: Jeffcoat Photography <jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 18:27:01 -0500

And most of them smell!!!!!!!!!!!! Yours anyway!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Cheers Wilber

"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" wrote:

> Don't mean to hurt your feelings Greg :-(
>
> I like the M just think the R is long past its prime (and that was 1983 when
> people actually used MF 35mm SLRs).
>
> While the M is a good tool, just because this is a Leica list does not mean
> I have worship everything stamped with the red Leica dot.
>
> Just my opinion which is different from yours. But hey, opinions are like
> butts, we all one.
>
> Peter K
> The voice of sanity
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Larsen [mailto:ohlen@lightspeed.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:37 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
>
> Greg writes:
> >>>
>
> Peter,
>
> Like I read in a recent magazine review about the Leica M6 TTL, "Flash? That
> why they have Nikons (and in your case Peter, Canons)"
>
> You're pretty obviously a Canon enthusiast from your previous messages. Why
> don't you stay in a mailing lists that talks about a system you can say
> something positive about??
> >>>
>
> Amen Greg.
>
> It's not like he has any new revelation...but more like he is recycling his
> old posts.  Someone on the list once said he was worth listening to, but I
> am
> going to consign his posts with Anthony's who at least was fresh.
>
> Bill