Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry Peter....this is just not you.....much too patronizing. You must have had a tough day!!!!!! Bob - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 6:09 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL > Typical leica zealot. You don't like my comments so you try to discredit > the author. > Hey, I am just saying my piece. I like the M but that does not mean I have > to like everything put forth on the LUG. Why would someone say 1/125 is too > slow when they are using 1/50 seconds? > That's all I was asking. Sorry you can't keep an open mind. > Let me make you feel better, Leica is good, Leica lenses are sharp, Leica is > wonderful, feel better now?! > > Peter K > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shih, Chiente [mailto:chiente.shih@unisys.com] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:50 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL > > > I can't help but read the reply to Peter even though I did the filter to get > rid of some nonsense posts by Peter. I am satisfied with my M6 Sync flash > speed. However I keep asking myself, why would someone spend lots of time to > post the anti-Leica messages in LUG ? Is it for fun ? or just the guy > doesn't know what to do in the mean time. Go out shooting and get a life ! > Don't troll! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com > [mailto:Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:40 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL > > > Peter, > > Like I read in a recent magazine review about the Leica M6 TTL, "Flash? That > why they have Nikons (and in your case Peter, Canons)" > > You're pretty obviously a Canon enthusiast from your previous messages. Why > don't you stay in a mailing lists that talks about a system you can say > something positive about?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) [mailto:peterk@lucent.com] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:45 PM > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > Subject: RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL > > > Sal DiMarco,Jr. wrote: > > edited.... > >For the first time, I had a chance to wrap my hands around a Konica > >Hexar RF and the Viogtlander Bessa-R and to see the new lenses. I was > >singularly un-impressed. Both cameras seemed filmsy. For me, the main > >advantage of the Hexar was the X-sync. The 1/125 sync doesn't cut it. I > told > >the salesperson, if is had a 1/250 sync, I would be leaving the show with > >one. His response was a 1/250 sync shutter would increase the cost of the > >camera. I do not agree with his statement. The lens mount was not smooth. > >The viewfinder OK. Word on the floor is the lenses aren't great. > > Then why are you satisfied with the 1/50 seconds on the M6? Personally I > would welcome the improvement, but unlike many I use flash. > > > >Just remember in terms of lens quality, there is good, better and Leica.! > > Yes. I will now get down on my knees and bow east to the great Leica > camera...barf!