RE: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL

["Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>]

I would hope so.  After all its not vanilla ice cream is it?

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jeffcoat Photography [mailto:jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 3:27 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL


And most of them smell!!!!!!!!!!!! Yours anyway!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Cheers Wilber

"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" wrote:

> Don't mean to hurt your feelings Greg :-(
>
> I like the M just think the R is long past its prime (and that was 1983
when
> people actually used MF 35mm SLRs).
>
> While the M is a good tool, just because this is a Leica list does not
mean
> I have worship everything stamped with the red Leica dot.
>
> Just my opinion which is different from yours. But hey, opinions are like
> butts, we all one.
>
> Peter K
> The voice of sanity
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Larsen [mailto:ohlen@lightspeed.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 1:37 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] PMA Show and LHSA's Black paint M6TTL
>
> Greg writes:
> >>>
>
> Peter,
>
> Like I read in a recent magazine review about the Leica M6 TTL, "Flash?
That
> why they have Nikons (and in your case Peter, Canons)"
>
> You're pretty obviously a Canon enthusiast from your previous messages.
Why
> don't you stay in a mailing lists that talks about a system you can say
> something positive about??
> >>>
>
> Amen Greg.
>
> It's not like he has any new revelation...but more like he is recycling
his
> old posts.  Someone on the list once said he was worth listening to, but I
> am
> going to consign his posts with Anthony's who at least was fresh.
>
> Bill