Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"David W. Almy" wrote: Bill, I don't mean this in a hostile way, but do you have any facts regarding what is going on inside Leica or are you merely relying on Leica's stock price, anecdotes and your external view to draw these conclusions? .................................................................. Bill's reply: Hi David, You can be hostile, I don't take this personally. Leica is a publicly traded company. As such, there are public documents that you, I, or anyone else can read about the company if we choose to seek them out. There are also news paper and magazine articles available. Yes, some of them are in German, which you will have to translate if you are not a native German speaker, but the information is there. Because of my well known interest in Leica Camera and my outspoken posts to this group, which have at times been picked up and reposted to German financial servers, plus my reputation for being very discrete, I receive a lot of very interesting e-mails. I have been fortunate enough to be able to separate the good information from the not so good information. For example this morning I received an e-mail for a very credible source that confirmed a rumor I have heard about a questionable practice being employed by the Leica Sales/Marketing department. ................................................................. David Almy wrote: Stock prices are not always reliable indicators, as I am sure you know. ................................................................. Bill's reply: Yes David, this is absolutely true. But, when you take a companies stock price over a long period of time, convert it to a graphical representation, and compare it to various indicators, you can draw some accurate conclusions. For example, generally, Leica stock has sold below it's 38 day moving average since June of last year. That is very significant. In other words, generally, the stock has been declining in value since June of last year. That is not good...especially if you are a stock holder. ................................................................... David Almy wrote: A reasonable person might conclude that if Cohn is competent, he has or is developing and implementing plans to improve the company, which will not happen overnight. Very few of these plans would be public knowledge. ................................................................... Bill's reply: Hanns-Peter Cohn is a competent executive. There is no question about that. He has a proven track record that speaks for itself. As for "plans to improve the company". When judging the performance of a company and/or a CEO in a given situation, you look for results. Pure and simple. The cold hard facts are that Herr Cohn has been on the job for a year now. Leica sales are in the toilet. Leica stock, which over the long term is usually a quite accurate indicator of a companies health, is in the toilet. There are sort term things which could have been implemented to increase sales, but these have, for what ever reason, not been implemented. Most of this stuff is not rocket science. There are a number of elementary things which need to be done that the current management team lacks the courage to do...which is not uncommon in a situation like this. Herr Cohn needs to bring in an aggressive outside consultant to point the sales/marketing and product development departments in the right direction. The benefit to this is if the consultant is right, Herr Cohn gets all of the credit. If the consultant is wrong, the consultant takes all of the blame. Herr Cohn can't loose, but I can't for the life of me figure out why he hasn't done it. .................................................................... David Almy wrote: How have you discovered them? Your concerns are valid. Your advice is very common sense. What is missing is hard and likely company-internal facts to support what appears to be conjecture regarding Cohn's performance. ................................................................... Bill's reply: Herr Cohn's performance, like the performance of all CEO's, will be judged by the companies bottom line. You are going to have to trust me on this, but Herr Cohn DOES NOT send me Leica financial figures every week. I liken Herr Cohn at Leica to the performance of Mr. John Sculley (sp) at Apple Computer. Mr. Sculley came from PEPSICO to become CEO at Apple. Mr. Sculley is a good CEO, but did not have a "feel" for the computer business and subsequently damn near drove Apple into the ground. Even his successor, who's name I forget from National Semiconductor, was unable to turn it around. It took Steve Jobs, who has a "feel" for that business to turn the company around and take the company stock from $14 a share to $115 a share. To put it politely, Herr Cohn needs to bring in someone who can turn around the sales/marketing department and increase sales. I truly wish Herr Cohn the best. Regards, Bill Erfurth m6rf@yahoo.com . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com