Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rod Fleming wrote: > > And that is why, to get back to the point, I'm depressed. Because I had > believed that when my trusty F4s die, I would be able to fall back on my > even trustier F3s, since Nikon, as part of their much-proclaimed ongoing > support for their manual focus customers, would always maintain production > of a top-line manual body. And now Mike tells me I won't be able to do that > after all. So much for Nikon's support. (Last year I had to scrap a > perfectly good Nikon lens because the aperture ring was damaged, and Nikon > UK had no spares. (!!!!!) Thank you so much, Mr Nikon.) Relax, Rod. I own a 1987 Hasselblad 2000FC/M: I was advised that supplies of parts could be iffy, that NOS spare electronics might not be good, and that the trade-in program towards a 200-series body intended to get those old cameras out of circulation. Awful news? Maybe not! First of all, I haven't taken the 2000FC/M parts-availability test as my camera has been trouble-free and if it did go dead on me and parts weren't available, do you think I'd toss it into the wastebasket? Not a chance; I'd sell it as a parts camera! I could certainly choose to keep away from the abyss by buying a 200-series camera now, but we are talking at least $3,334 for a 202FA which won't even allow me to choose between lens and focal plane shutters: On the other hand, I paid $600 for my 2000FC/M which does. The vast amount of money I am saving right now should handily pay for a 203 or 205 someday, and these are more logical upgrades for me. That is, if the 2000FC/M ever breaks and if it isn't easier just to buy another FC/M or FC/W. I am not going to lose any sleep over this one and I suggest that you do the same--there are a LOT of F4s and F3s out there, some of which will probably outlive us all, along with a lot of Canon AE-1s. Realize also that while your gear is not *officially* serviceable there are a lot of UNofficial routes as anyone who has had an M3 rangefinder refurbished might attest. At least in the US of A, I think it's a waste of time to send older gear such as F2s and MD3s to Nikon; far better to find a good independent who isn't afraid to subsitute or fabricate needed parts. - -- Jeff Segawa Somewhere in Boulder, Colorado