Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Julian - Obviously the only way to answer this question is totally subjectively. I find the 28 a bit too wide to be a good "normal" lens, and not nearly wide enough to be wide. The 35, on the other hand, will do most of what a 50 will do and yet allows you to get a good bit of "environment" in your picture. The 75 is quite dear...but then - God forgive me - there is the new Voigtlander/Cosina 75 2.5, which is reputed to be quite good and is not at all expensive...That is if you don't want a 90.. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Julian Thomas Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 10:28 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] LEICA Incentives? - ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> > Julian - If you're talking about an M, go for 35/75, or 35/90.... I'd love the 35/75 but I can't afford the 75!! I'm trying to find the best deal on a couple of M4-Ps together with a couple of lenses. I'm finding that with the leicas I'm borrowing at the moment I'm getting in closer than I have done with slrs. I've used a 35/85 for years - but the 28/50 seems to sit better for me with the leicas (or maybe a 35/50!!). I think when I find somewhere that has what i want in on the day I'm set to buy, I'll do whatever is available. Julian