Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>Do you have any information that says the first versions are any better? I take it you don't believe Erwin is correct in his assessment that the 2nd version is optically better because of only one aspherical surface?<<< Yes, equipment matters. But increasingly fine distinctions between very good types of equipment is not going to make any difference to anyone. Anybody who owns either aspherical-element 35mm Summilux owns one hell of a lens. NO ONE who owns either aspherical-element 35mm Summilux gets brownie points over and above anybody else who happens to own the other one. That's not what it's all about. Next question? [Austin] The purpose of the original question was to find out why the first version price was 2x the second version, it had nothing to do with fine distinctions. It appears that because it has some features that some people like (such as a focusing band, as opposed to only a tab, which may make it much easier to use than the second version..which I was unaware of, not having seen both lenses), or because of it's limited production (to a collector), some people are willing to pay a premium for it. Optically, I do not believe it justifies the 2x price tag, and is, for the most part, a moot point. That's basically what I wanted to know. I completely agree, either one is a damn find lensE ;-) - ----------------------