Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have the 21mm Asph. and finder, and was playing with it last night. I thought the extremes of the viewfinder in the 0.72 corresponded very closely with the 21mm brightline finder's view. However, with the brightline finder there is very little intrusion of the lens into the field of view, and the finder gets blurry when you are straining to see the edges of the field. Tom Schofield - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:18 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] 21mm vs. 24mm > With the .72, you don't need a viewfinder for the 24. That's why I chose the 24 over the 21... > > ---------- > From: pfang > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 6:29 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] 21mm vs. 24mm > > > Folks - > > Need your thoughts in regards to choosing between a 24 > vs. 21, both the newest model. > > I would shoot primarily landscapes...and have heard > both are amazing performers...but the viewfinder is a > bit of a pain > > Thanks, > > Peter > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. > http://im.yahoo.com > > >