Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Absolutely...I meant what's the alternative in terms of the quality....In terms of the cost, used is THE way to go...Although I will admit that I buy new bodies if there's any way I can afford it...figuring that every year someone else owned a body is a year closer to a major repair for me...But lenses? If the glass is good, why go new? - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 8:00 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Friedlander & Leica 21 mm lenses "B. D. Colen" wrote: > > The reality is that they are all astronomically expensive. But what's the > alternative? ;-) > USED is my alternative. THe new 903 Biogon is five and a half grand in unmarked american money. A good used SWC is less than half that. All I need is T* and I'm happy. I don't even need CF. Mark Rabiner