Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- -------------------- Begin Original Message -------------------- Message text written by INTERNET:leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us "Please help me to understand why step less shutter speed gives better results than half stop or automatic. I don't understand that statement unless you only shoot slides." - -------------------- End Original Message -------------------- I do use slide film almost exclusively. I also run in to the maximum aperture of the lens on a regular basis. With color negative films the automatic modes of my R4sP are all I need but for my wildlife subjects, where I'm often dealing with an extreme range of brightness values (such as a bird with both black and white plumage) any over- or under- exposure will cause me to lose detail in some area. From experience I cannot rely on an auto-exposure function alone to give me correct exposures, and using exposure compensation has proven more time-consuming than simply setting the shutter speed manually according to prevailing light conditions. With wildlife subjects I often don't have time to spare. Also with wildlife subjects I'm usually using a long lens hand-held, so I want the shutter speed as fast as possible. That means leaving the lens at full aperture and using the shutter speed alone to set correct exposure. I do see a difference in a 1/4 stop exposure error. Doug Herr Sacramento http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/telyt