Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree the Viewfinder Editor should receive pay. It is a high quality product and must take a lot of time to poroduce. Bill Grimwood At 10:45 AM 3/21/00 -0600, you wrote: > Roy Moss does a magnificent job editing Viewfinder, and he certainly >should be paid to do it. People who argue against that should be ashamed of >themselves. (I don't know the man, by the way; but I know good editing.) It >is particularly silly to argue that whether to pay someone for a job should >depend on whether the person has other income. > >Fred > > >>From: "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com> >>Subject: [Leica] Re: LHSA >> >>- ----- Original Message ----- >>From: Bill Grimwood >>> The editor gets $1500.00 per issue for his efforts in putting out the >>> Viewfinder. >>I seem to recall in the LHSA meeting, Bill, that we only approved putting >>money away for one year towards a budget that *could* eventually go towards >>paying an editor. No decision was made to actually pay the editor anything >>yet. In fact, I made the motion to set up the fund, mostly so we could get >>off dead-center and move on to other concerns, since there did not seem to >>be any consensus on whether to start paying money to the editor. >> >>So, in effect, we tabled the decision on whether LHSA would pay an editor, >>but set up a budgeted fund that could be used for that purpose if the board >>decides to do so next year. Roy Moss, as far as I know, is not getting any >>payment for the fine job he is doing with the "Viewfinder". >> >>Bill Rosaurer may be able to clarify from the board minutes, but the above >>notes reflect my best recollection. >> >>Regards, >>Gary Todoroff >>Tree LUGger >>LHSA Board Member >> > > >