Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] The M6 Fugue
From: "Anders Nygren" <anygren@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:24:45 -0600

De: Afterswift@aol.com <Afterswift@aol.com>


>Dear Colleagues,
>
>You are missing the point. The worst thing that could happen would be to
get
>what you're dreaming about. If Solms bestowed an electronic M on you, it
>would be bogus. Why? Because it would not be manual. It would lose the
>tactile quality that makes the M the precision camera system it is. It
would
>be an assembled camera, not a hand finished camera. That loss would show in
>the negatives and prints.
>
Yes I definitely  am missing your point. Not only that, I am at a loss of
words.
I have spent quite some time trying to come up with a response that is fit
for
polite company.
But anyway
1, Who are You to say what I can be allowed to dream about?
2, What on earth makes You think that an electronic camera can NOT be
manual?
3, I dont understand your distinction between an assembled and a hand
    finished camera.
4, How does an electronically controlled shutter contamine negatives and
prints.
5, How come that this does not affect slides?

Or are You just trying to say that an electronic version of the M6 would
ruin
the mystique and pride of ownership of a fully mechanical tool.

/Anders Nygren