Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The M6 Fugue
From: "A.H.SCHMIDT" <horsts@primus.com.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:50:22 +1100

Dave Richards wrote:

> With all due respect, this is like saying that an automatic weapon makes a
> shooter a better marksman, because he (she) now has a 30-round magazine
> with which to hit a target once, instead of doing it right with one round.

Dave, something in this example is lacking.  In your camera you have a 36
exposure magazine. Now if you fit a motor drive, then you have an automatic
shooting camera with a 36 shot magazine. What's the difference. You still have to
aim with both systems.


Its amazing, how some automatic parts on a camera are not considered as
automatic.

For example the Flash TTL metering. What is not automatic about this.  The big
complaint by many Leica users about the new Hexar camera was the lack of TTL
flash metering.

Comments like:" This is a big minus" or "how could they?" and so on.  Often by
the
"Never any automatic for me"   People. How selective!   What this people should
be doing to  get  a totally non automatic flash unit, or better use bulbs and
use the guide number, divide it by the distance and then set the aperture.
Anything else is not creative. Or is it? I bet some of you don't even know
anymore how to work out the settings manually. At worst they use the calculator
on the back of the flash unit.

Why is it, that as soon as someone mentions a M type Leica with automatic it
reverts to a M6AE?  Even if it was referred to as M7 or M8. Instantly, a replay
comes back:" No way do we want a M6AE".

Nobody mentioned anything about an M6 automatic. Leave the M6 (With all its
automatic functions) as is and make it an M6 derived M7AE.

 All it needs is a big red M6   or a big M7AE on the front of the camera, and
everyone instantly notices the creative M6 users  and the non creative M7AE
users.

However the proof ,finally, is in the pictures.

 Regards, Horst Schmidt


 NB. When Leitz released The M3, after the 3F, a big part of the advertising was
the
incorporation of the automatic Flash sync. As compared to the manual setting of
the 3F.

Nobody then seemed to have complained about this >futuristic, noncreative<
addition. What went wrong?