Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Timothy R. Kuntz" wrote: > Since I have the 90/2.8 and am planning on getting the 35 as a second lens, would you recommend getting the 50 first? > Tim K No, seeing that you have a 90, your next lens should be the 35. From there on it's a personal matter. I would make my third lens a 24, or perhaps a 21. Then I would fill the gap and get the 50. The 50 is a very useful lens, but getting it as your second lens, after the 90, makes little sense: they are both on the long end. Bernard